Search results for "Survey studies"

showing 2 items of 2 documents

A Case For a Study Quality Appraisal in Survey Studies in Psychology

2019

The lack of replication of key effects in psychology has highlighted some fundamental problems with reporting of research findings and methods used (Asendorpf et al., 2013; Open Science Collaboration, 2015). Problems with replication have been attributed to sources of bias such as questionable research practices like HARK-ing (Kerr, 1998) or p-hacking (Simmons et al., 2011). Another potential source of bias is lack of precision in the conduct and methods used in psychological research, which likely introduces systematic error into data collected with the potential to affect results. A related issue is lack of accuracy in reporting study methods and findings. There is, therefore, increased r…

Systematic errorOpen scienceOpinionquality assessmentApplied psychologylcsh:BF1-990study quality appraisalAffect (psychology)läpinäkyvyysresearch methodscorrelational studiessurvey researchtutkimusmenetelmätPsychologylaadunarviointiGeneral Psychologyta515Research methodtransparencyStudy qualityScientific progressevidence synthesesPsychological researchmetodologiamethodologyTransparency (behavior)lcsh:PsychologypsykologiaCognitive Sciencessurvey studiesPsychologysurvey-tutkimusFrontiers in Psychology
researchProduct

A checklist to assess the quality of survey studies in psychology

2020

Abstract Study quality is emerging as an essential component of evidence syntheses. It allows practitioners and policymakers to make informed decisions based on the quality of the evidence reviewed. Study quality is typically assessed by checklists of pre-determined quality criteria. Few study quality checklists have been systematically evaluated, and none have been developed specifically for survey studies in psychology. The present study addresses this evidence gap by developing the quality of survey studies in psychology (Q-SSP) checklistusing an expert-consensus method. An international panel of experts in psychology research and quality assessment (N = 53) evaluated the inclusion and i…

media_common.quotation_subjectApplied psychologylcsh:BF1-990kyselytutkimusSample (statistics)psychologyTransparencyläpinäkyvyysSurvey studiescorrelational studiesClinical ResearchtutkimusmenetelmätCriterion validityPsychologyQuality (business)Set (psychology)laadunarviointiReliability (statistics)media_commonStudy quality assessmenttransparencyevidence synthesesPsychological researchGeneral EngineeringlaatuCorrelational studiesstudy quality assessmentChecklistkorrelaatioTest (assessment)lcsh:PsychologypsykologiaEvidence synthesestutkimussurvey studiesPsychologyarviointisurvey-tutkimus
researchProduct